For those who would like to know more
about state/government employment, that is. There’s an article in today’s Strib about the pending budget forecast, and many of the comments on the article (usually something to stray from, as it makes me quite concerned about the people I live near, seemingly so ignorant and angry all the time) talk about “fat” in state government and employment practices. So, having worked for the state for the last six years (and for city government for three years in high school), I thought I’d set a few thing straight without getting into the Republicans vs Democrats argument, just for my own conscience. Let me note first that my bias should be obvious, that I’m a state worker, and that my future career is in education, where I will continue to be a union member. So if you feel the need to write off my opinions/observations because of that, go right ahead.
In my experience, which is only with one agency, there is very little “fat” or “pork” in government. Minnesota has been on a hiring cool or freeze for the entire 6 years I’ve been here, which is why I have almost no seniority (I’m sixth from the bottom, and the last two are part-time employees). Add to that all of the people who could retire (age-wise) but aren’t because their retirement funds / investments aren’t doing well, and that doesn’t bode well for job security at the moment. Also, when I started here, we had nine support staff at the administrative office. Today, we have five. We cut 7 admin positions a few years ago (out of 40), and continue to pare down and only hire when absolutely necessary, all across the state.
State agencies have been asked to trim budgets practically ad nauseum over the last few years. That monthly meeting I no longer have to go to? Budget update in every single one of them. It should be noted that most of our money is federal money, but that we have to have state money first (called “match”) to pull down the federal dollars (approximately 1:4), and the federal bill that provides our budget is under a continuing resolution for the last several years, because it’s not “important enough” for legislators to spend the time on to reapprove or reauthorize.
I was amused by the people calling for dismantling the public employee unions. Not gonna happen. As someone else said, the state is one of the largest employers in the state. There’s no way we’re giving up our union voluntarily, and I’m pretty sure that it’s a legally protected right to unionize that our predecessors fought tooth and nail for. One of the more amusing statements was that “unions are what’s killing our economy.” Really? Exactly how?
Someone asked about the return on investment for state programs. I don’t know what it is like for other programs, but for ours, for every $1 we spent, approximately $4 goes back into the economy (because we get people off or state aid and into jobs where they become contributing members of the workforce).
Several people think that we get raises all the time. This is true and false. State employees do get an annual “bump” that’s a reward for continuing to work there. It’s about 1%, give or take, and is merely meant to keep people in the job (which is hard to do - people often leave state employment to go work in the private sector because they can earn much higher wages there, even in a field like mine where wages are pretty low all over). Our contracts are negotiated every two years, and this last time (for the 2007 and 2008 years) we did get raises, because the Governor wanted to thank us for all our hard work, or something to that effect. Prior to that, there were no raises in at least two contracts (four years), if not longer, which means that the 2% (or was it 3%) annual raises didn’t come close to making up for the increase in cost of living and rising health care premiums. There is no way that our salaries are actually keeping up with the cost of living or inflation. It should be noted that this is probably the same for most employees everywhere, not just in the public sector. I’m pretty sure that raises are few and far between these days, and that no one is keeping up with the cost of living.
There was the glorious suggestion of getting rid of health care and retirement plans for state employees (both current and former). The ridiculousness of this suggestion, as well as all that it would mean, I can’t even comment on. Do people not think anymore?
Additionally, it was said that no one is “balancing the checkbook,” referring to the idea that government didn’t see this coming. That is just bunk. Like I said earlier, there are budget projections being done all the time. I work across from our budget guy, and he, along with our other numbers guy, work out that stuff weekly. So do the higher ups. What hit everyone like a surprise (though no one is really surprised) is this recession, which severely changes economic situations quite quickly. Think about it - a year ago, our house was worth $30,000 more than it is now, and the houses we’re currently interested in are approximately $50,000 less than they “should” be. Changes like that affect government budgets in ways that can’t always be predicted, and even when they can be, we always like to hope for the best (but plan for the worst). Trust me, there’s a lot of balancing the checkbook, at all levels of the government.
There were also several comments about schools that I’d like to mention briefly. One was that we should get rid of the extraneous classes in schools like violin. Several other people noted on the article that this poster was obviously off of his/her rocker, because most schools don’t have things like that. It should be noted that the schools who do have provisions such as smartboards and violin tutors are in very wealthy areas and are funded by property taxes supplemented by state funds. The majority of schools barely have bands, and when they do, parents and students have to do fund-raising to provide uniforms. Someone also suggested that schools should get “back to the basics” which is an admirable suggestion that I’ve probably made myself once or twice. However, it fails to take into account that most of the extraneous programming in schools has been demanded by parents and community members. The moment things like that are cut, people start complaining, and parents really know how to complain (and soccer moms scare me, so I don’t really want to deal with that).
Lastly, my favorite suggestion was cut state employee’s salaries 0.5% each month of the recession, followed by balance the budget and then cancel the legislature for two years. Why is this my favorite? Because it’s quite possibly the most narrow-minded, selfish, and ignorant comment of them all. Why would you intentionally punish state workers, who are NOT the cause of the recession, in such a way? Just so we’re clear, after one year, salaries would be at 56% of their current rate. After two years, 30%. That’s a 70% decrease in salary. That means that before the end of two years, you’d have to stop decreasing salaries because you’d hit the minimum wage law. And since many predictions think that the economy won’t turn around until 2010, it’s not an exaggeration to talk about 2 years of cuts. Let’s also remember that the Great Depression lasted 10 years, and this idea, if it ran to fruition and there weren’t minimum wage laws, would mean that sometime in the 5th year my salary would drop to under $1/hour. Also, do you really think it’s possible to balance the budget that quickly? That’s laughable in and of itself. I’m pretty sure that argument takes the entire year, sometimes longer, to work itself out. And our local legislators don’t actually make that much money (for the most part).
Now that I’ve bored you all to tears, or angered you in some way, I have to leave to go to class. Lest you think I’m leaving my cushy state job for a paid afternoon of education, you are wrong. The state isn’t paying for my education, and I make up the hours that I’m gone by working longer hours every other day of the week. I will, however, enjoy my employee benefit of a relatively cheap bus pass to get to class. Of course, the student bus pass is a fraction of what I pay, but I figured we could afford to pay the higher rate and let someone who needs the cheaper bus pass have it (there are limited numbers that the school could afford to supplement).
popularity: 1%
posted in rant |
tagged: work
no comments
on this day in...
- 2007: Boo — So I was feeling pretty good this morning, all things considered. Alas, I now have a headache. I’ve consumed caffeine [...]
- 2007: So cute! — OK, to be clear, I have no need for these in my life. But I ran across them in [...]
- 2007: Just a bit sleepy — We had a great weekend in Pensacola / Mobile, but we’re glad to be back. I’ll have to update [...]
- 2007: Tuesday Twosome — What two things do you “have” to wear when it is chilly/cold outside? Mittens and a scarf. What are two good [...]
- 2006: Oh. My. Freak. — ’s baby is due in 14 days. 14 days!!!!! That’s 2 weeks for those of you who aren’t [...]

loaded up the dishwasher this morning, or maybe it was last night). But, the kitchen table is covered with boxes of Christmas decorations, the rug in the living room is coated in cat hair, and upstairs is very cluttered (the exception being the bedroom, except that I have two baskets of folded laundry sitting on the floor that I still haven’t put away). It’s not that we don’t try to keep the house clean, but that we have had so few showings, its hard to stay motivated and feel the need to keep it absolutely pristine 24/7. Plus, has anyone noticed that it’s nearing Christmas time? That means decorations and parties and, personally, cookie baking and crafting. Those are all messy things, right? [Editor's note: it should be said that I don't actually have any holiday parties to attend, nor do I think I'll be invited to any other than family functions, but that doesn't really mean my house is any cleaner because of it.]




for Christmas. It turned out really well.



’s quilt (which means that I put borders on the center panel, and then cut out and appliqued on the large G). Then I laid out all three layers and pin-basted. Hopefully tonight
asked on Saturday, “how soon can it be done?” When I told her I had 10-20 hours left on it (because I have no idea how long it will take me to quilt it, and the only binding I’ve ever done has been on small projects which take 2-ish hours), she was shocked. Yes, darling, while this quilt isn’t terribly complicated or difficult, it still takes time to complete. I am pretty sure that she will love the end result, though, because the “back” (which, the more I look at it, is really the front) is quite darling, with the green plaid and the large G.
is gone and Coworker B is answering phones anyways), and did I want to take a break first. I declined, thinking it was odd that she even ask. A few minutes later, I walked over to where the other two have their cubes, and lo and behold, Coworker B has left for the day, without telling me. Seems she was allergic to her phone duty or something. So now I’m here, stuck without any backup, to answer phones for two hours when it’s not my turn. Boo on that.


gave me an update on
last week, and
).